Skip to main content

Authors | Priti Joshi

Priti Joshi is Professor of English with affiliations in Asian Studies, and Gender & Queer Studies at the University of Puget Sound. Recent publications include a paper on advertisements in Victorian Periodicals Review and another on the India exhibit at the Crystal Palace in Museum History Journal. She is completing a book entitled Empire News: The Anglo-Indian Press Writes India on newspapers of the Bengal presidency between 1840 and 1860.

Articles on Amodern by Priti Joshi


A Conversation with Mita Mahato

If the digital age has relegated paper to an old medium, it has also changed the significance of paper’s ephemerality. The artist Mita Mahato, who works in cut paper, collage, comics, and limericks, has been exploring this new significance in a visual idiom that is both playful and wary. We met with Mahato to discuss her work’s unique engagement with disposability, the Anthropocene, nostalgia, and survival.


Like some winged insects, ephemera – the plural of the Greek ephemeron – denotes things that last through the day. Maurice Rickards defined it as “the minor transient documents of everyday life” – bus tickets, business cards, bookmarks. Ephemera describes modern mass media forms such as the newspaper and radio broadcasts, as well as contemporary ones such as email and short message service. Ephemera haunts classical aesthetics, whose pretensions to cultural value and endurance can figuratively efface its own materiality and fragility. Ephemera similarly menaces concepts and practices of history, even when it serves as evidence of the past and the stuff of the archive. Indeed, ephemera problematizes memory itself: Wendy Hui Kyong Chun has theorized that digital media create an “enduring ephemeral” of constantly refreshing, regenerating information, introducing as much instability into computer programs as abides in putatively more fallible, degenerative human memory. With this observation, the paradox of ephemera – that it was meant to be disposable and fleeting, but is instead often kept and collected – comes into view as a central ambivalence of modern mediated life.

This special issue of Amodern historicizes and theorizes ephemera and ephemerality across two centuries of media and archival encounters. Linking historical and new media studies, we broaden the traditional definition of ephemera from daily, paper-based material to temporary architecture, theatrical performance, radio broadcasts, pixels, and social media. The issue links ephemera scholars focused on paper to those interested in radio, television, computational, and digital media and arts. The benefit of this cross-temporal and -media conversation runs two ways: new media scholars are reminded that print offered no materially stable media past, and nineteenth-century scholars acquire a new vocabulary that will sharpen their analysis of “old” media and low-tech materials. By creating a long history of ephemera, the issue affords connections between mass culture, political memory, and ideologies of freedom across different historical moments. For example, in our present big data moment, the seeming imperishability of certain forms of social media has produced a dialectical turn toward an ideology of freedom in the deliberate deletion of documents. Yet this turn is usefully refracted through forgotten or neglected Romantic-inflected ephemeral practices and aesthetics, such as inkblot art, which also valorized a transgressive impermanence.


Ephemerality and Memorialization in the Archive of Indian Newspapers

Newspapers are the textbook definition of the ephemeral, their preservation and study not always a high priority. Newspapers’ recent digitalization has moved many onto a more accessible and enduring platform.  The access a digital archive promises, however, was superseded by the practice of scissors-and-paste that gave news stories a tail and served as a form of historical preservation. Focusing on nineteenth-century English-language newspapers from India, this paper traces the circulation of news items between Britain and India and illustrates that reprints functioned as instruments and barometers of public memorializing. Digitization allows us to trace the reach of this strategy of endurance and public memory-making practiced by British editors.